Compare Local vs. Cloud with Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis
This tool helps you evaluate infrastructure options based on your specific context, not as an inevitable migration path.
Note: User count alone is a weak cost predictor. Request frequency, data volume, and concurrency matter more.
Includes uploads, downloads, database transactions, and analytics processing.
Steady = consistent load, Spiky = unpredictable peaks (e.g., marketing campaigns, events)
The calculations below show infrastructure costs only. They exclude:
Check all factors that apply to your situation to estimate true costs.
Compare how each option handles different factors based on your inputs.
| Factor | Local / On-Prem | Cloud | Your Fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost Predictability | High (Fixed) | Low-Medium (Variable) | - |
| Elastic Scaling | Low (Manual) | High (Auto) | - |
| Ops Burden | High (Your Team) | Lower (Shared) | - |
| Time-to-Market | Slower | Faster | - |
| Data Control | Full Control | Vendor-Dependent | - |
| Skill Requirements | Ops-Heavy | FinOps-Heavy | - |
Estimated infrastructure costs based on your inputs:
Primarily fixed costs
Mix of fixed + variable costs
Real story: A developer left a small AWS instance running "for testing."
Result: A $33 surprise bill after a month of zero active usage.
Lesson: Cloud billing is opt-out, not opt-in. Without budgets, alerts, and teardown policies, costs leak silently.
Best if you need cost predictability and have strong ops skills.
Ideal for: Stable workloads, data sovereignty requirements, predictable traffic.
Best if you need elasticity and want to reduce ops burden.
Ideal for: Variable workloads, rapid scaling needs, limited ops team.
Split workloads based on characteristics.
Ideal for: Mixed requirements, phased migration, risk diversification.
Based on your selection, consider these actions: